I am not going to write a weather-related piece today, as everyone is likely receiving plenty of information through the usual sources. As I write this, it is mid-day Wednesday and it the path of Hurricane Laura is becoming more certain. It appears it will not hit Houston directly, which if forecasts hold would help to mitigate the impact. However, many are still directly in the path of a very dangerous storm, and our thoughts and/or prayers are with them. Our support will be needed in the aftermath.
Obviously, there is concern about what impact this event could have on our
COVID-19 outbreak. If large numbers of people are displaced, and forced
into congregate shelters, this will create a risk of spread of COVID-19.
Public officials have taken steps to limit the size of shelters and
incorporate distancing principles into their design and operation, but any
significant population displacement will place additional pressure on disease
control efforts.
So with that brief nod to the issue that is on everyone’s minds today, I will
return to an update on COVID-19 issues. A couple of weeks ago, I posed the question to
all of you: “If you were advising one of
our presidential candidates, or local leadership, or a company executive on
preparation for the next global pandemic, what is your priority?” You
emailed your responses to me, or posted them on Twitter using the hashtag
#TheNextPandemicBCM where they are still available for review. Following
a brief review of our COVID-19 numbers, I want to report what you said.
The COVID-19 numbers continue to trend well, for the most part. From
prior posts, you know we are focused on three primary metrics:
R(t), diagnostic test positivity rates among TMC facilities, and the number of
new daily COVID-19 cases in Harris and surrounding counties.
Recall the R(t) calculation is an estimate of viral infectivity, influenced by
the properties of the virus and community dynamics. Simply put, if I am
infected with COVID-19, the R(t) is a statistical estimate of how many other
people I am likely to infect. If R(t) is less than 1.0, Houston is
winning; greater than 1.0, SARS-CoV-2 is winning.
Even with a highly infectious virus (like measles), if we are truly and
completely isolated from everyone else – a condition which only exists as a
hypothetical – the R(t) would be effectively zero. Conversely, if we all
tend to congregate in crowded spaces with poor air exchange for prolonged
periods of time, even a virus which is not inherently very infectious could
have a very high R(t). This is why attention to masking and distancing is
so important. The good news this week is the R(t) has been consistently
less than 1.0 for 16 consecutive days. As of now, we are winning.
Our second metric is the rate of positive tests among all tests ordered by
Baylor and other TMC affiliate institutions. This is a rough gauge of
viral prevalence, which we would like to see sustainably below 5%. The
TMC positive test percentage is now 6.7%, and has been slowly trending downward.
This is not where it needs to be, but is headed in the right direction.
If you follow the city, county and state numbers, you will note that
their percentage positive tends to be a few points higher. This probably
reflects some selection bias on the part of the Baylor and TMC facilities
cohort. Although we test symptomatic people in our ambulatory clinics,
much of our testing is asymptomatic employees in surveillance programs, and
asymptomatic patients admitted to hospitals, who would be expected to have a
low positivity rate.
However, we are very confident in the integrity of the data point we generate,
which is why we have chosen this as our metric.
Finally, our most problematic metric: new daily COVID-19 cases in the
community. This number is (very) slowly drifting down, and on a 7-day
rolling average basis is between 1,400 and 1,500. This is good news is
that in mid-July we were at about 2,400 cases. However, we are still
seeing 5-6 times the number of daily cases compared to May, and for public health
officials to have a realistic chance of performing effective contact tracing it
needs to be closer to 200. This metric is the most methodologically
flawed, for reasons I have previously reviewed, but should be increasingly reliable as state data issues
are resolved.
In summary, the trends are encouraging, and hopefully future community
stressors like school reopenings, the Labor Day holiday, flu season, etc. will
not set us back.
Please continue to preach the masking and distancing message to your circles of
influence.
I hope we as a nation will get to a point soon – we are not even close yet –
where we can stop managing the crisis in front of us, and begin to focus on how
to be better prepared for the next pandemic. That was the point of the
five word #TheNextPandemicBCM exercise. Roughly 100 people from the broad
Baylor community responded. Some people responded with tactical concerns,
such as the need to stockpile PPE. A few made – mostly respectful – statements
favoring one side of the political spectrum or the other. Most responses
addressed broad, fundamental key principles. Taken individually, none of
the principles is particularly surprising; however, there were four major themes
when taken together constitute a thoughtful outline for how we can be better
prepared next time – the BCM crowd-sourced pandemic preparedness plan:
- Elevate the role of rigorous science in public policy. Example of five words: Build public confidence
in science; Clear communication improves scientific understanding; Trust
scientists and not Facebook. Fully one quarter of respondents
reflected this theme in some way.
- Build reliable data and reporting systems. Five words: Worldwide electronic medical
interconnectivity; Good data drives good decisions; Reliable information
must unite us.
- Invest in public health infrastructure and education. Your words: Comprehensive integrated public
health network; public health in high school; Public health investment
dollar well spent (technically, this last one is six words, but it was too
good not to include)
- Effective leadership is critical. Effective leadership: national, regional, local; Good
leadership drives action; Clear messaging from leadership unites.
Our limited “Twitter poll” is
obviously not a methodologically sound, comprehensive analysis of our current
state nor an attempt at meaningful future planning. However, the Baylor
community does represent an interesting collection of researchers, educators,
clinicians and learners. Our exercise does represent a limited snapshot
of the mood of this community at a time we were still actively engaged in our
struggle with the virus. Based on this snapshot, we should be advocating
for public health curricula across the entire educational landscape: elementary
to graduate school. Our more informed populace will need reliable data
presented in an accessible manner. Our scientific community will continue
its long-established commitment to academic integrity. Leaders need to be
able to promote an environment of trust and confidence. These concepts
may seem so obvious as to be trite. However, if we do not actively work
to address these – and no doubt other – issues now, our motivation and sense of
urgency will flag as COVID-19 fades into memory. As a learning health
system, we have an obligation to hold our societal feet to the fire.
Stay well and stay safe.
(Note: Between June 2020 through November 2021, I
wrote weekly COVID-19 pandemic updates seen through the lens of a health
sciences university. My intent was to
provide reliable information, acknowledge legitimate concerns, console, and
encourage. Each posting reflects issues
our community was experiencing at that moment in time. I have reproduced selected examples on this
site).